In practice, steps fail: data is missing, a model does not converge, or an input violates an assumption. This vignette shows how {pipeflow} reports such failures, how a run can be continued for unaffected steps, and how to pick up the pieces once the cause is fixed.
A pipeline that fails
We use a small pipeline whose check step fails if the
data exceeds a limit.
library(pipeflow)
pip <- pip_new("analysis") |>
pip_add("data", \(n = 5) seq_len(n)) |>
pip_add("check", \(x = ~data, limit = 3) {
if (max(x) > limit) stop("data exceeds limit")
x
}) |>
pip_add("model", \(x = ~check) mean(x)) |>
pip_add("total", \(x = ~data) sum(x))With n = 5 and limit = 3, the
check step will fail, and the model step
downstream of it cannot run. The total step, however, only
needs the data step.
Stop at the first error
By default, pip_run() stops at the first step that
fails.
pip_run(pip)
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.521 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.521 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.523 UTC]: Step 2/4 check
# error [2026-10-13 15:28:11.525 UTC]: data exceeds limit
# Error:
# ! step 'check': data exceeds limit
pip
# <pipeflow> analysis (4 steps)
# -----------------------------
# step params depends state out
# 1: data n done 1,2,3,4,5
# 2: check x,limit data failed [NULL]
# 3: model x check new [NULL]
# 4: total x data new [NULL]
# -----------------------------
# <failed> last run: 2026-10-13 15:28:11
pip_run_state(pip)
# [1] "failed"The pipeline stays in a defined state. The failed step is marked as
failed, the steps that were not reached are still
new, and the run state indicates that the last run ended
with an error.
Let’s inspect the error object returned by
tryCatch().
err <- tryCatch(pip_run(pip, lgr = NULL), error = \(e) e)
class(err)
# [1] "pipeflow_step_error" "error" "condition"
err$step
# [1] "check"
class(err$parent)
# [1] "simpleError" "error" "condition"
err$parent$message
# [1] "data exceeds limit"The error is of class pipeflow_step_error. Its field
step names the failed step and the field
parent holds the original condition, which keeps its own
class, so that errors can be handled by class:
Continue after errors
In the previous run, the total step was not run,
although it does not depend on the failed step, because the run stopped
early. With on_error = "continue" in
pip_run(), a failing step is still marked as failed but the
run can continue for all other steps that do not depend on it:
pip$reset()
suppressWarnings(pip_run(pip, on_error = "continue"))
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.897 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.897 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.898 UTC]: Step 2/4 check
# error [2026-10-13 15:28:11.899 UTC]: data exceeds limit
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.900 UTC]: Step 3/4 model - skipping step, input 'x' failed
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.900 UTC]: Step 4/4 total
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:11.901 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# warn [2026-10-13 15:28:11.902 UTC]: Run of pipeline 'analysis' continued after 1 failed step:
# 'check': data exceeds limit
# Steps not run because an input failed: 'model'
pip
# <pipeflow> analysis (4 steps)
# -----------------------------
# step params depends state out
# 1: data n done 1,2,3,4,5
# 2: check x,limit data failed <error/simpleError>
# 3: model x check new [NULL]
# 4: total x data done 15
# -----------------------------
# <continued> last run: 2026-10-13 15:28:11
pip_run_state(pip)
# [1] "continued"Now total was calculated, while model was
skipped, because its input depends on the failed step. The
out column of a failed step holds the condition, which is
printed in short form as <kind/class>.
To work with it programmatically, we can extract it as usual:
out <- pip[["check", "out"]]
class(out)
# [1] "simpleError" "error" "condition"
out$message
# [1] "data exceeds limit"Let’s inspect the warning object returned by
tryCatch().
w <- tryCatch(
pip_run(pip, lgr = NULL, on_error = "continue"),
warning = \(w) w
)
names(w$failed)
# [1] "check"
w$skipped
# [1] "model"The warning is signalled after all states and outputs are stored, so
catching it with tryCatch() does not lose any results.
Mitigate failed inputs with try()
Sometimes a step should run even if one of its inputs failed, for
example a report that mentions what is missing or if a fallback is
available. Such an argument is marked by wrapping the step reference in
try():
pip_add(
pip,
"report",
\(total = ~total, m = ~try(model)) {
if (inherits(m, "pipeflow_failure")) {
paste("total:", total, "- no model:", m$message)
} else {
paste("total:", total, "- mean:", m)
}
}
)
suppressWarnings(pip_run(pip, on_error = "continue"))
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.138 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.138 UTC]: Step 1/5 data - skipping done step
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.139 UTC]: Step 2/5 check
# error [2026-10-13 15:28:12.140 UTC]: data exceeds limit
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.140 UTC]: Step 3/5 model - skipping step, input 'x' failed
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.141 UTC]: Step 4/5 total - skipping done step
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.141 UTC]: Step 5/5 report
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.142 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# warn [2026-10-13 15:28:12.143 UTC]: Run of pipeline 'analysis' continued after 1 failed step:
# 'check': data exceeds limit
# Steps not run because an input failed: 'model'
pip[["report", "out"]]
# [1] "total: 15 - no model: step 'model' was not run: step 'check' failed: data exceeds limit"Instead of the output of model, the m
argument received a failure object, a condition of class
pipeflow_failure, which stands in for the missing output.
The message tells why the input is not available. It has the fields
-
step: the step that provided the input (model), -
failed_step: the step that actually failed (check), and -
parent: the original error condition.
A step is only run despite a failed input if all its failed
inputs are marked with try(). Everything else is skipped,
as model above. Note that try() has an effect
only in a continuing run. With on_error = "stop", the run
ends at the failed step anyway.
Recover from failures
Both skipped and failed steps are retried in the next run, and so are steps that got a failure object. Steps that were completed are not run again. Let’s fix the cause by raising the limit and re-run:
pip_set_params(pip, list(limit = 10))
pip_run(pip)
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.209 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'analysis'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.210 UTC]: Step 1/5 data - skipping done step
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.210 UTC]: Step 2/5 check
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.211 UTC]: Step 3/5 model
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.212 UTC]: Step 4/5 total - skipping done step
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.212 UTC]: Step 5/5 report
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.216 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'analysis'
pip
# <pipeflow> analysis (5 steps)
# -----------------------------
# step params depends state out
# 1: data n done 1,2,3,4,5
# 2: check x,limit data done 1,2,3,4,5
# 3: model x check done 3
# 4: total x data done 15
# 5: report total,m total,model done total: 15 - mean: 3
# -----------------------------
# <ready> last run: 2026-10-13 15:28:12The run log shows that data and total were
skipped, since they were completed already. The failed step
check and the skipped step model were executed
now, and so was report, because it had received a failure
object instead of the real output. The report now contains the model
result and the run state is ready again.
pip[["report", "out"]]
# [1] "total: 15 - mean: 3"
pip_run_state(pip)
# [1] "ready"Failures in split pipelines
Failures also work with the execution modes split and
reduce, which are described in the vignette on split, map, and reduce. Let’s
split a small data set by group and let the spread step
fail for groups with a single row.
d <- data.frame(g = c("a", "a", "b", "b", "c"), y = c(1, 2, 3, 5, 8))
pip <- pip_new("groups") |>
pip_add("data", \(data = NULL) data) |>
pip_add("by_group", \(data = ~data) split(data, data$g), exec = "split") |>
pip_add("spread", \(d = ~by_group) {
if (nrow(d) < 2) stop("need at least 2 rows")
diff(range(d$y))
}) |>
pip_add(
"combine",
\(s = ~try(spread)) {
if (inherits(s, "pipeflow_failure")) {
return(s$message)
}
unlist(s)
},
exec = "reduce"
)
pip_set_params(pip, list(data = d))If one partition (group c) fails, the whole
spread step fails. The condition tells the failed key and
keeps the original one as parent:
suppressWarnings(pip_run(pip, on_error = "continue"))
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.412 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'groups'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.412 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.413 UTC]: Step 2/4 by_group
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.414 UTC]: Step 3/4 spread
# error [2026-10-13 15:28:12.418 UTC]: key 'c': need at least 2 rows
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.418 UTC]: Step 4/4 combine
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.419 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'groups'
# warn [2026-10-13 15:28:12.420 UTC]: Run of pipeline 'groups' continued after 1 failed step:
# 'spread': key 'c': need at least 2 rows
pip
# <pipeflow> groups (4 steps)
# ---------------------------
# step params depends state out exec
# 1: data data done <data.frame[5x2]> auto
# 2: by_group data data done <list[3]> split
# 3: spread d by_group failed <error/pipeflow_key_error> auto
# 4: combine s spread done step 'spread' failed: key 'c': need at l... reduce
# ---------------------------
# <continued> last run: 2026-10-13 15:28:12
err <- pip[["spread", "out"]]
class(err)
# [1] "pipeflow_key_error" "error" "condition"
err$key
# [1] "c"
err$parent$message
# [1] "need at least 2 rows"The combine step reduces the outputs of all groups.
Since the input spread failed and is marked with
try(), combine ran once and received the
failure object, with the key in the message:
pip[["combine", "out"]]
# [1] "step 'spread' failed: key 'c': need at least 2 rows"Likewise, if the pipeline is run with on_error = "stop",
the error is a pipeflow_step_error as before, with the
pipeflow_key_error as its parent. Without
try() in the combine step, it would just be
skipped.
Failures are currently tracked per step, not per key, so the groups
a and b that were fine are not available as
results of a run that failed in group c. Once the cause is
fixed, here by removing the group, the pipeline completes:
pip_set_params(pip, list(data = d[d$g != "c", ]))
pip_run(pip)
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.554 UTC]: Starting run of pipeflow 'groups'
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.555 UTC]: Step 1/4 data
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.556 UTC]: Step 2/4 by_group
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.558 UTC]: Step 3/4 spread
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.560 UTC]: Step 4/4 combine
# info [2026-10-13 15:28:12.563 UTC]: Finished run of pipeflow 'groups'
pip[["combine", "out"]]
# a b
# 1 2Summary
- By default, a failing step stops the run with a
pipeflow_step_errorthat names the step and holds the original condition inparent. -
pip_run(on_error = "continue")marks the step asfailed, stores its condition as output, skips the steps that depend on it, and runs everything else. The run state becomescontinued, and apipeflow_run_failedwarning lists both failed and skipped steps. - A reference wrapped in
try(), e.g.x = ~try(step), makes a step run despite a failed input. The argument then receives apipeflow_failurecondition. - The next run retries any failed and skipped steps (and those that received failure objects).
- For steps that map over partitions, the condition of the failed
partition is a
pipeflow_key_errorwith the fieldkey. Areducestep with atry()reference receives the failure.
